Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific aims of the project? Have the investigators presented strategies to ensure a robust and unbiased approach, as appropriate for the work proposed? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success presented? If the project is in the early stages of development, will the strategy establish feasibility and will particularly risky aspects be managed? Have the investigators presented adequate plans to address relevant biological variables, such as sex, for studies in vertebrate animals or human subjects? If the project involves clinical research, are the plans for 1) protection of human subjects from research risks, and 2) inclusion of minorities and members of both sexes/genders, as well as the inclusion of children, justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed?Įnvironment.
Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of research or novel in a broad sense? Is a refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions proposed?Īpproach. Are the PD/PIs, collaborators, and other researchers well suited to the project? If Early Stage Investigators or New Investigators, or in the early stages of independent careers, do they have appropriate experience and training? If established, have they demonstrated an ongoing record of accomplishments that have advanced their field(s)? If the project is collaborative or multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise are their leadership approach, governance and organizational structure appropriate for the project? Does the project address an important problem or a critical barrier to progress in the field? Is there a strong scientific premise for the project? If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice be improved? How will successful completion of the aims change the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field? For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact. Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below in the determination of scientific and technical merit, and give a separate score for each. Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following review criteria, and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed). Read them carefully for helpful hints on the information and content you should include in the application to garner a favorable evaluation. The following sections describe the criteria reviewers employ to evaluate applications. Although a number of factors contribute to whether your application will be funded, we place great emphasis on the review of scientific merit. During NIH’s peer review process, we convene a panel of non-Federal scientists to review your application. What Peer Reviewers Look ForĬareful preparation and an understanding of how your application will be reviewed can help you build a solid application. If instructions in either the application guide or funding opportunity conflict with an NIH Guide notice (including a Notice of Special Interest), the notice wins.
If instructions in the application guide and funding opportunity conflict, the opportunity wins.
HELP WRITING A ROUGH DRAFT OF A GRANT HOW TO
General application form instructions are found on the How to Apply - Application Guide page.
Application forms are posted with each funding opportunity.What to Know Before You Start Writing Where to Find Application Instructions First Level of Review - Scientific Review Groups.Additional Elements Required in a Grant Application.Foreign Involvement: Institution and/or Investigator.Are You a New or Early Stage Investigator.Research Resources, Institutional Support and Available Expertise.Where to Find Instructions for Writing Your Application.
0 kommentar(er)
